[Reinhold Birkenfeld] >> One more issue is open: the one of naming. As "path" is already the >> name of a module, what would the new object be called to avoid >> confusion? pathobj? objpath? Path? [Michael Hoffman] > I would argue for Path. Granted "path" is actually os.path, but I don't think it's wise to have stdlib modules whose names are differentiated only by case, especially on Windows (and other case-insensitive filesystems). =Tony.Meyer
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4