RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 26 21:00:21 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054441.html

Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 06:57 PM 6/26/2005 +0200, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
>>1226256:
>>The "path" module by Jason Orendorff should be in the standard library.
>>http://www.jorendorff.com/articles/python/path/
>>Review: the module is great and seems to have a large user base. On c.l.py
>>there are frequent praises about it.

[...]

> Aside from all these concerns, I'm +1 on adding the module.
> 
> Here's my list of suggested changes:

[...]

I agree with your changes list.

One more issue is open: the one of naming. As "path" is already the name of
a module, what would the new object be called to avoid confusion? pathobj?
objpath? Path?

Reinhold

-- 
Mail address is perfectly valid!

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054441.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding the 'path' module (was Re: Some RFE for review)