[Raymond Hettinger] > > I think it unwise to allow x to be any expression. Besides altering > > existing semantics, it leads to code redundancy and to a fragile > > construct (where the slightest alteration of any of the expressions > > triggers a silent reversion to O(n) behavior). [Gerrit Holl] > What would happen if 'x' were to be an object whose class has a __eq__ > that is defined in an odd way, e.g. having side effects? Every molecule in your body would simultaneously implode at the speed of light. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4