RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 17 17:55:48 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054296.html

Yes please. That one will never get past me as long as I'm alive.

(At PyCon I met one person who proposed an even more radical approach;
I think he wanted getattr(None, <anything>) to return None. But he was
certified insane. :-)

On 6/17/05, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 02:55, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > After nine months, no support has grown beyond the original poster.  The
> > PEP did however generate some negative responses when brought-up on
> > comp.lang.python (it made some people's stomach churn).
> >
> > The PEP fails the tests of obviousness and necessity.
> 
> I agree.  The fact that None is not callable is a /feature/ IMO.  +1 for
> rejecting this PEP.
> 
> -Barry
> 
> 
> 
> BodyID:129997985.2.n.logpart (stored separately)
> 
> 

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054296.html below:

[Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 336 -- Make None Callable