RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 17 15:36:25 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054290.html

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 02:55, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> After nine months, no support has grown beyond the original poster.  The
> PEP did however generate some negative responses when brought-up on
> comp.lang.python (it made some people's stomach churn).
> 
> The PEP fails the tests of obviousness and necessity.

I agree.  The fact that None is not callable is a /feature/ IMO.  +1 for
rejecting this PEP.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050617/e79027f4/attachment.pgp

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054290.html below:

[Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 336 -- Make None Callable