RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 17 15:29:00 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054288.html

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 02:39, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> While the majority of Python users deem this to be a nice-to-have
> feature

Really?  Where's the supporting poll data?  In over 10 years of Python
programming, I've never once needed a Roman number literal.  Worse, I
don't buy the compatibility argument.  I'm as anal as anyone about PEP 8
style, but that's still no reason to break code like

>>> MIX = True

I wouldn't be opposed to a library that provided a function to convert
to and from Romans but I don't think Python needs Roman numeral literal
support.

+1 for rejecting.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050617/9b09348e/attachment.pgp

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054288.html below:

[Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 313 -- Adding Roman Numeral Literals to Python