At 08:46 PM 6/1/2005 +0200, Eric Nieuwland wrote: >Nice going! But ... > >Could we extend the 'try' syntax for this instead of introducing >'with'? If I look at the translation it an augmented 'try'. > with EXPR as VAR: > BLOCK1 > except EXCEPTION: > BLOCK2 >could then be translated to -1, too confusing. >Can the 'throw()' method be renamed 'raise()'? IMHO that makes much >clearer what happens. No, 'raise' is a reserved word. It would have to be 'raise_()'. -0. >Same thing with 'GeneratorExit', 'StopGeneration' more closely matches >'StopIteration'. StopIteration is raised the *other* way, so closely matching isn't really a benefit. -1.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4