> I'm unclear why the list in "for x in [1,2,3]" or "if x not in [1,2,3]" > can't fairly easily be recognized as a constant and just be placed in the > constants array. That part got done (at least for the if-statement). The question is whether the type transformation idea should be carried a step further so that a single step search operation replaces the linear search. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4