A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058915.html below:

[Python-Dev] Keep default comparisons - or add a second set?

[Python-Dev] Keep default comparisons - or add a second set? [Python-Dev] Keep default comparisons - or add a second set?Michael Urman murman at gmail.com
Tue Dec 20 15:59:04 CET 2005
On 12/19/05, Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote:
>
> Michael Urman <murman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such as sorted(stuff, key=id)?
>
> I believe that ideally, canonical orderings would be persistant across
> sessions.

Erm, yes, I totally missed that in Jim's original preferred
requirements. And I nearly wrote another response ignoring Jim's use
case of persistence, as I'm having trouble thinking of any (others)
where order matters yet comparability doesn't.

Michael
--
Michael Urman  http://www.tortall.net/mu/blog
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4