RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 14 22:50:53 CET 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058775.html

> I've pushed out a revised PEP 8
>
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
>
> Please review and comment.

Why does PEP 8 continually refer to one particular editor (Emacs)?   
(There are even parts in the form "x is better because it works  
better in Emacs", when surely it's actually the case that x is better  
because it's better in the majority of editors.)

ISTM that the PEP would be much simpler if it was completely editor- 
agnostic, but perhaps there's some historical reasoning I'm not aware  
of?

=Tony.Meyer

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/058775.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 8 updates/clarifications