Ron Adam wrote:
> I don't feel there is a need to avoid numbers entirely. In this case I
> think it's the better way to find the n'th seperator and since it's an
> optional value I feel it doesn't add a lot of complication. Anyway...
> It's just a suggestion.
Avoid overengineering this without genuine use cases. Raymond's review of the
standard library shows that the basic version of str.partition provides
definite readability benefits and also makes it easier to write correct code -
enhancements can wait until we have some real experience with how people use
the method.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4