On 30 aug 2005, at 17.11, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Hey guys, don't get lost in random naming suggestions (cut, snap, > part, > parts, yada yada yada). Each of those is much less descriptive and > provides less differentiation from other string methods. Saving a few > characters is not worth introducing ambiguity. Trisect would be pretty descriptive ... //Simon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4