On 2005-08-30, Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:26, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> > My major issue is with the names - partition() doesn't sound right to >> > me. >> >> FWIW, I am VERY happy with the name partition(). > > I'm +1 on the functionality, and +1 on the name partition(). The only other > name that comes to mind is 'separate()', but > a) I always spell it 'seperate' (and I don't need another lamdba <wink>) > b) It's too similar in name to 'split()' > trisplit()
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4