RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 30 05:29:16 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055793.html

Hi,

  How about piece() ?  Anthony can have his "e"s that way too! ;-)
  and it's the same number of characters as .split().

Cheers,
  --ldl

On 8/29/05, Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:26, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > > My major issue is with the names - partition() doesn't sound right to
> > > me.
> >
> > FWIW, I am VERY happy with the name partition().
> 
> I'm +1 on the functionality, and +1 on the name partition(). The only other
> name that comes to mind is 'separate()', but
> a) I always spell it 'seperate' (and I don't need another lamdba <wink>)
> b) It's too similar in name to 'split()'
> 
> Anthony
> 
> --
> Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ldlandis%40gmail.com
> 

-- 
LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055793.html below:

[Python-Dev] partition() (was: Remove str.find in 3.0?)