RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 24 21:52:13 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055643.html

"Raymond Hettinger" <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> writes:

>> > Hmm, that may not be a killer.  I wonder if it is possible to treat
>> > BaseException as a constant (like we do with None) and teach the
>> > compiler to interpret it as catching anything that gets raised so
> that
>> > "except BaseException" will work like a bare except clause does now.
>> 
>> Sorry Raymond, but my first reaction is "ick" :).  That seems to be a
>> big change in the semantics of exception matching.  I think I'd rather
>> keep bare except than add that!
>
> That may be your only other option if we're waiting until 3.0 to
> eliminate string exceptions and class exceptions not derived from the
> hierarchy.

I really hope string exceptions can be killed off before 3.0.  They
should be fully deprecated in 2.5.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  The Oxford Bottled Beer Database heartily disapproves of the 
  excessive consumption of alcohol.  No, really.
                        -- http://www.bottledbeer.co.uk/beergames.html
                           (now sadly gone to the big 404 in the sky)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-August/055643.html below:

[Python-Dev] Bare except clauses in PEP 348