On 8/14/05, Neil Schemenauer <nas at arctrix.com> wrote: > It looks like the process of converting a CVS repository to > Bazaar-NG does not yet work well (to be kind). The path > CVS->SVN->bzr would probably work better. I suspect cvs2svn has > been used on quite a few CVS repositories already. I don't think > going to SVN first would lose any information. > > My vote is to continue with the migration to SVN. We can > re-evaluate Bazaar-NG at a later time. That's looks like a fair assessment -- although it means twice the conversion pain for developers. It sounds as if bazaar-NG can use a bit of its own medicine -- I hope everybody who found a bug in their tools submitted a patch! :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4