> "Grégoire Dooms" <dooms at info.ucl.ac.be> wrote in message > news:42F32EF7.6050208 at info.ucl.ac.be... > >This patch is about to celebrate its second birthday :-) > >What should I do to get it reviewed further ? > The guaranteed-by-a-couple-of-developers way is to review 5 other patches, > post a summary here, and name this as the one you want reviewed in > exchange. > TJR Speaking of the five-patch-review-rule, about two months ago I reviewed five patches and posted a summary here in order to push patch #1049855. This patch is still waiting for a verdict (this is also my own fault, since I needed several iterations to get this patch straightened out; my apologies for that). Is there anything else I can do for this patch? --Michiel.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4