On Sep 7, 2004, at 4:51 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: >> (I'm really looking forward to Subversion 1.1; all the advantage of >> Subversion, without the disadvantage of Berkeley DB...!) > > What *is* the disadvantage of Berkeley DB that the file storage of > svn 1.1 will remove? One of the things that you could do in CVS that > you can't easily do because of the DB approach is to ultimately > remove a file, along with its entire history (by removing the ,v file). > Along with that goes the option of moving part of a repository into > another repository. The biggest complaint I've heard, and I believe the reason for the optional alternative database implementation in 1.1, is that the Berkeley DB must be on a single local volume. -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4