Barry wrote: > I'll point out that Template was very deliberately subclassed from > unicode, so Template instances /are/ unicode objects. From the > standpoint of type conversion, using /F's notation, T(8) == U, thus > because U % 8 == U, T(8) % 8 == U. from a user perspective, there's no reason to make templates a sub- class of unicode, so the rest of your argument is irrelevant. instead of looking at use patterns, you're stuck defending the existing code. that's not a good way to design usable code. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4