RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 2 18:47:45 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/048546.html

Anthony (the other one), can you explain it?

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:26:12 +1000, Anthony Baxter
<anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
> > [Anthony Baxter]
> >
> >>Erm - this particular fix was a bug fix. I'm deeply uncomfortable about
> >>adding the C version of datetime to 2.3 at this very late stage of 2.3's
> >>life cycle.
> >
> >
> > It's quite arguably a bugfix, since datetime.h in 2.3.4 exposes things
> > that can't possibly be used outside of datetimemodule.c
> 
> Ah - I misunderstood, and thought that 2.3 had no version of datetime.c
> at all, and Guido was proposing that we add it. So, to get this
> straight, what _are_ we talking about, exactly? Is there an SF
> bug/patch with the trunk change?
> 
> 
> --
> Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
> 

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
Ask me about gmail.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/048546.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules threadmodule.c, 2.56, 2.56.8.1