RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 26 17:05:31 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049635.html

"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes:

> At 12:31 PM 10/26/04 +0100, Michael Hudson wrote:
>>"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes:
>>
>> > At 09:36 AM 10/25/04 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> >>Well, then perhaps code object comparison (and function object
>> >>comparison) ought to work the same as 'is', not try to do something
>> >>clever?
>>
>>+1
>>
>> > Isn't that what function objects do now? (for some value of "now")
>>
>>Probably.  I don't see the relavence, though.
>
> Because Guido sounded like he was saying that function objects didn't
> already do that.

Uh, yeah, I clearly wrote that post before I'd drunk enough coffee...

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Java sucks. [...] Java on TV set top boxes will suck so hard it
  might well inhale people from off  their sofa until their heads
  get wedged in the card slots.              --- Jon Rabone, ucam.chat

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049635.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Pythoncompile.c, 2.330, 2.331