Skip Montanaro wrote: > Bob> By default can mean that Python builds a SQLite wrapper if SQLite > Bob> is available, just like it does for bsddb, readline, etc. > > Then why not MySQLdb, psycopg and sybase-python also? No slight intended > against PySQLite, but those other wrapper modules have been around quite a > bit longer I think. SQLite plays in a different league: it is much more like Sleepycat DBM than a full-blown multi-user database engine where you'd use one of the many other database modules. But I understand what you're saying: by placing one of the many possible solutions into the distribution we would be playing Microsoft, in a sense, by branding this one solution as "better" simply because it's easier to use. However, I don't see this happening in the Python world. E.g. take a look at PyXML vs. the vast and healthy set of tools available through third-parties. Placing PyXML into the core hasn't killed off these external projects. Maybe we should have this discussion on more general grounds: do we really want a fat Python distribution or should we focus more on making installation of third-party tools easier ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Oct 21 2004) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4