On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:18:13 +0100, David Wilson <dw-python.org at botanicus.net> wrote: > I think it raised a point though - there were a few wildly different > ideas about what ConfigParser's replacement should be. Would it be wise > to discuss first what ConfigParser is *supposed* to be, and where it > fits in peoples' applications? > > If this hits a chord with you, pump your reply button and discuss! Skip Montanaro has proposed the creation of a ConfigParserShootout page on the Wiki. Shouldn't this discussion be moved there? BTW I have my own ideas on the topic... and I'm willing to put them there on the Wiki, if that's the way to go. And as far as the rest of David's comments -- I agree, let's keep it simple, and move all data processing stuff out of the library. -- Carlos Ribeiro Consultoria em Projetos blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com mail: carribeiro at gmail.com mail: carribeiro at yahoo.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4