Gerhard Haering wrote: > Hi python-dev-elopers, > > Last December, we had a short thread discussing the integration of > PySQLite into Python 2.4. At the time, I was against inclusion, > because I thought PySQLite was not ripe for it, mostly because I > thought the API was not stable. > > [...] > > I think that a simple embedded relational database would be a good > thing to have in Python by default. And as Python 2.5 won't happen > anytime soon, there's plenty of time for developing it, getting it > stable, and integrating it. SQLite is a gem and PySQLite works great, but I don't see why we should start adding third-party tools of this size (>38k LOC C code) to the standard Python distribution. Perhaps you we should consider adding only the Python interface and then ship a DLL with the Windows installer like we do for expat and the Sleepycat DBM ?! -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Oct 20 2004) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4