RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 13 20:07:17 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049387.html

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 13:56, Peter Astrand wrote:

> The PEP doesn't say anything about this, but my intention is that the
> module should work on Python 2.2 and newer. My employer really needs this.
> If the subprocess module in the Python CVS won't work with 2.2, I'm
> forced to keep a separate "fork". I would be happy if this could be
> avoided.

There's no reason to fork it.  (Reasonable) backward compatibility in
the 2.4 library can be supported as long as it's documented, which is
now is.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20041013/dc2f70c5/attachment-0001.pgp

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049387.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Lib subprocess.py,NONE,1.1