RetroSearch Browse

Sun Oct 10 14:49:55 CEST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049305.html

fredrik at pythonware.com said:
> While we have you on line, can you pronounce on the subprocess module?
> The code is written by highly experienced programmers, it has been
> widely tested, it's entirely self-contained, builds and runs under 2.2
> and later, has an extensive test suite and a PEP (which can be quickly
> turned into a library reference section), and replaces several fragile
> API:s in the current library with a single, well-defined construct.
> If this isn't good enough for the standard library, I don't see what
> is.

hear, hear!

Jason

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049305.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: subprocess - updated popen5 module