On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 01:44:58AM +0400, Michael P. Dubner wrote:
> I'm posting PEProposal for discussion. Last part is reasoning for
> posting it in this hot time.
I like this proposal; it begins to impose some degree of sanity on the
standard library.
(If you want editing help with the grammar and text of the PEP, let me
know; I'll happily polish the wording.)
> logging.getLogger('stdlib.BaseHTTPServer').setLevel(logging.FATAL)
There's been discussion in the past of having a name for the Python
standard library, so that 'from <name> import httplib' would always
get the standard httplib module. This name should match whatever's
using in the logging, so the logging should use a name everyone is
happy with using in import statements. Whether that's stdlib or std
or __std__ or Lib isn't important, as long as the logging matches.
PEP 8 should also gain some text encouraging the use of the logging
module in code and describing the dummy.junk convention.
--amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4