On May 31, 2004, at 2:50 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Shane Holloway (IEEE) wrote: >> Does this mean that the implementation of Stackless 3.0 could be >> acceptable to integrate into CPython 2.5? It would be absolutely >> wonderful to have those capabilities available in the standard >> distribution! > > Probably not. Stackless 3.0 works only on selected hardware; a > number of platforms currently supported by Python would not be > supported anymore. An implementation of stackless python should > work on all platforms (atleast on those currently supported by > Python). Although I don't particularly agree with that, because Stackless functionality could be turned on and off with a platform dependent configure flag (like threads or unicode)... Is there a canonical list of CPU architectures and platforms that Python officially supports? -bob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2357 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040531/5fc17d6f/smime.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4