Eyal Lotem wrote: > Why is Python still not stackless? But it is: http://www.stackless.com/ If you are asking: Why is python.org Python still not stackless? then I think the answer has varied over time. The most recent answer is that no volunteer has stepped forward to make Python stackless. That, in turn, likely hasn't happened because it is hard to do, and because nobody has seen any reason to do so as you could always use Stackless Python. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4