Guido van Rossum wrote: > There doesn't need to be 100% agreement. This thread (which is indeed > getting nowhere) started with my assertion that we should do it, using > late binding. I haven't changed my mind yet. I'm still waiting for > someone to volunteer to review the code once more and check it in. Sure. And this was what I was referring to. Lotsa noise, little traction. <wink> This isn't meant as a slap at anyone - I am quite aware of time limitations. I guess I was hoping to prod someone into stepping forward and doing the work. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4