On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 16:21, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Another possibility that has been suggested is > > > > [decorator] > > def func(arg, arg): > > And one that I currently favor. I'm out of bandwidth to participate > on a msg-by-msg basis, but perhaps folks can see if they can come to > terms with this solution? I don't like it. It already has a meaning (albeit fairly useless) and it doesn't seem obvious from just looking at it that the decorator is connected to the following method. It doesn't taste Pythonic to me. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4