On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 20:20, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I suggest that the the break-less solution > > > > [classmethod, logged, debug] def function(args): > > Sorry, can't do that with the current parser. Actually I think that's a good thing - it forces everyone to format things the same way. I was a fan of the "def foo() [decorator]" syntax but I've changed my mind - this way has several things going for it: - Simple implementation - More or less forces one style of code layout - Doesn't break tools that look for "def foo(" type patterns ` - Short-circuits the endless syntax discussion :-) Mark Russell
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4