At 21:52 30.03.2004 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: >[[decorator]] # easy enough to type, or this already just valid syntax today ><decorator> # almost as easy, or ><<decorator>> > >Is there near precedent in other languages that I don't know of? VB.NET uses <...> for .NET attributes instead of [...]. OTOH <...> is a usual syntax for parametrized types, e.g. C++ templates, Java,C# generics and others It seems VB.NET will use a syntax with (...) for that.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4