> I guess going grocery shopping removed my voice in this area *wink*. Actually it was long ago decided that the pronouncement would be either one dot or multiple dots; other ideas have been removed from consideration. > There was a thread on an a VMS-style relative package option that used > negative integers for a relative imports. The thread with this line of > thought starts with Stephen Horne's post here: > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl3068059620d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&safe=off&selm=ra4q401p3ld92uthl6l34u8vfqq39567n0%404ax.com > > I personally like that it is concise for deeply nested relative imports, > and doesn't require counting of dots. We didn't really get any 'elder > developers' to comment on that syntax. OK, since you asked: Yuck. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4