Raymond Hettinger wrote: > If I volunteer to do the release, would there be any objections to > targeting late May or early June for the first alpha? It really depends on how many of the big-ticket items are going to be in the release. Remember: a 2.4 that's broken is far, far, far worse than a 2.4 that's 6-8 weeks later. Python's release cycle has historically been cautious and measured. I really don't see why we need to rush this one. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4