[Walter Doerwald] > For me '@' looks like something that the compiler shouldn't see. I don't understand. Why? Is that what @ means in other languages? Not in JDK 1.5 -- the compiler definitely sees it. > How about: > > def foobar(self, arg): > .author = AuthorInfo(author="GvR", version="1.0", copyright="GPL", ...) > .deprecated = True No, I want to reserve the leading dot for attribute assignment to a special object specified by a 'with' statement, e.g. with self: .foo = [1, 2, 3] .bar(4, .foo) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4