[Shane Hathaway] > As I understood it, 'b' and 'c' are supposed to be substitutable in > the following example, since 'b' and 'c' will have the same value > even after 'a' changes: > > a = [] > b = (a,) > c = (a,) Fair enough. Do interesting/valuable use cases appear then?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4