A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043376.html below:

[Python-Dev] Two possible fixes for isinstance nested tuples

[Python-Dev] Two possible fixes for isinstance nested tuples [Python-Dev] Two possible fixes for isinstance nested tuplesGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat Mar 20 16:18:15 EST 2004
> Bug #858016 brought up the issue of deeply nested tuples of classes
> segfaulting isinstance and issubclass.  There is a patch with the bug
> report that adds a check to make sure the tuple is completely shallow.
> 
> For Python 2.3, though, that doesn't work since it breaks code.  So I have
> coded up something that calls Py_GetRecursionLimit and makes sure the
> depth never goes past that.
> 
> The question is which solution to use for  Python 2.4 .  I did some
> benchmarking on as-is and with the recursion check and the performance
> difference is no worse than 2% (granted this was before I made the
> recursion functions static, but that should  just help performance).
> Would people rather do the recursion check or force people to use a
> shallow tuple in 2.4?

I mentioned in person to Brett to use the same solution in 2.4 as in
2.3.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4