A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043350.html below:

[Python-Dev] redefining is

[Python-Dev] redefining is [Python-Dev] redefining isNeil Schemenauer nas-python at python.ca
Fri Mar 19 17:28:39 EST 2004 
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:33:41PM -0500, Andrew Koenig wrote:
> It certainly doesn't *require* a builtin operator.  I do think,
> however, that the proposed comparison is more useful than "is" in
> most contexts in which programmers use "is" today.

Are you saying that most instances of "is" in current Python code
are incorrect?  If not, what do you mean by more useful?

  Neil
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4