A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043295.html below:

[Python-Dev] A proposal has surfaced on comp.lang.python to redefine"is"

[Python-Dev] A proposal has surfaced on comp.lang.python to redefine"is" [Python-Dev] A proposal has surfaced on comp.lang.python to redefine"is"Andrew Koenig ark-mlist at att.net
Fri Mar 19 12:42:39 EST 2004
> I would say that Python is served well by the two equality predicates
> it has, that it is impossible to please everyone, and that users
> should get used to writing the predicate they want if it is not one of
> the builtins.

Without disagreeing with your statement, I can also say this:

The fact that "is" is so easy to use encourages some programmers to use it
when they would be better off with a different predicate that is much less
readily available.  If "is" represented this other predicate instead, most
programs that use it would be better off. 


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4