> I would say that Python is served well by the two equality predicates > it has, that it is impossible to please everyone, and that users > should get used to writing the predicate they want if it is not one of > the builtins. Without disagreeing with your statement, I can also say this: The fact that "is" is so easy to use encourages some programmers to use it when they would be better off with a different predicate that is much less readily available. If "is" represented this other predicate instead, most programs that use it would be better off.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4