> > BTW, I assume this discussion is only about refining the conventions > > for method and function names. CamelCase for class names is still > > recommended, right? > > It is by me, and I channel that it also is by Guido. Indeed. > Dissension will be > crushed <wink>. Module and package names seem muddier, although I think a > lot of projects (including the Python core) have been moving toward short > one-word all-lower names for those (especially for packages at top level). Another pronouncement then: modules/packages need to be short all-lower names (no underscores). StringIO, cPickle and SimpleXMLRPCServer etc. were mistakes. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4