[Shane Hathaway, on a piece of the Zope3 style guide
http://tinyurl.com/2885n
]
> Yes, but that policy fights with Python, leading to bad combinations.
I said "Zope" before, right <wink>?
> The first time I had to say something like
> "ZPythonScriptHTML_changePrefs" to a customer over the phone, I
> realized that the mixed conventions are a real problem.
No argument here.
> BTW, I assume this discussion is only about refining the conventions
> for method and function names. CamelCase for class names is still
> recommended, right?
It is by me, and I channel that it also is by Guido. Dissension will be
crushed <wink>. Module and package names seem muddier, although I think a
lot of projects (including the Python core) have been moving toward short
one-word all-lower names for those (especially for packages at top level).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4