> A very common use case in Python is where None is a valid value in a > dictionary: > > missing = object() > > if d.get('somekey', missing) is missing: > # it ain't there > > It even reads well! Indeed. Of course, object() is mutable, so there is no proposal to change the meaning of this program. What I'm concerned about is someone trying to do the same thing this way: missing = 'missing' if d.get('somekey', missing) is 'missing': # it ain't there This code contains a bug, but on an implementation that interns strings that happen to look like identifiers, no test will detect the bug.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4