On Thu, Mar 18, 2004, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:23, Jewett, Jim J wrote: >> >> There is an idiom (I've seen it more in Lisp than in python) >> of creating a fresh object to act as a sentinel. > > A very common use case in Python is where None is a valid value in a > dictionary: > > missing = object() > if d.get('somekey', missing) is missing: > # it ain't there > > It even reads well! Ugh. While I agree that the idiom has its place, this ain't one of them; you should be using ``in`` (or ``has_key()``). The standard idiom is even more readable, and there should be only one way to do it. Maybe you meant something more like if d['somekey'] is missing: -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "usenet imitates usenet" --Darkhawk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4