> This reminded me, I was wondering if pychecker could be included with > the next python distribution. > I think it would be very helpful to beginners in particular, but also > make it easier for everyone. > > Pychecker seems to be very stable now. I don't know if the people > maintaining it would agree to having it bundled with python though. > > In addition to merely adding the pychecker module, we might eventually: > > A. Add a command line switch for the python executable that enables > pychecker. The next time someone complains about some error that the > python compiler didn't catch, just tell them to run "python -strict" or > something to that effect. Works for me. Patch please? > B. Add a preference option to IDLE perhaps that will tacitly enter > "import pychecker.checker" before a new interactive prompt appears. I may be mistaken, but I thought that IDLE can already "check" modules using PyChecker if it is installed via a menu item. Otherwise it would be a great feature. I don't think it makes sense to do automatically on all code typed; it's too noisy for that. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4