At 06:17 PM 3/17/04 -0500, Andrew Koenig wrote: >(I'm partly expecting a response of >"It's not Pythonic," but I don't actually know why not). Three reasons why not: Simple is better than complex. In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4