Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >Yes, it's time for the classical question. ;-) > >What's your opinion about the inclusion of the dateutil[1] >extension in the standard library? > >[1] https://moin.conectiva.com.br/DateUtil > > Gustavo, +1000! I hadn't seen dateutil until today, but I think it is brilliant! Definitely fodder for the standard library. The functionality is similar to a module that I wrote a few years back, though I didn't model the advanced behavior after the iCalendar RFC. Unfortunately, I have lost the fight to open source most of my work from that era, so I am more than happy to help review and assist in the effort to incorporate your excellent module into the standard library. Some initial suggestion: 1) relativedelta and maybe the tz module should be added to the datetime module. 2) the tz module needs to be made Win32 aware -- at least minimally. It should also fail gracefully on systems that do not have /etc/localtime, /usr/share/zoneinfo, etc). 3) Some of the constants like FREQ_* may be nicer without the FREQ_ prefix. I almost never use 'from x import *', so it seems unnecessary to protect the module namespace with prefixes (unless there is an existing collision that I do not see). 4) Similarly, it would be useful to also support the long names for MO,TU,WE, etc. I'm happy to supply patches as well. Best regards, -Kevin Jacobs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jacobske.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 348 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040311/e9958fad/jacobske.vcf
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4