RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 6 12:17:34 EST 2004 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/042929.html

Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:

> When you give your -1,+0,+1 etc, please do it
> ONLY for this syntax, and do NOT vote based upon the *idea* if and only
> if combined with another syntax

+1

> This proposed new syntax is:
>
> 	funcdef: 'def' NAME parameters ['[' exprlist ']' ] ':' suite
>
> 	classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' testlist ')'] ['[' exprlist ']'] ':' suite

Why are the decorators an exprlist while the base classes are a
testlist?

  Bernhard

-- 
Intevation GmbH                                 http://intevation.de/
Skencil                                http://sketch.sourceforge.net/
Thuban                                  http://thuban.intevation.org/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/042929.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration