> > Yes, I'm sure. The proposal is that if n is an integer, iter(n) should > > iterate over the elements of range(n). > > I understood that; I don't see how you connect that with sets.Set(42). > I don't see the word "set" anywhwere in that pep. The connection is that sets.Set will accept an iterator as its argument, so if integers become iterators, sets.Set(42) should work.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4