On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 12:28, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
> > We may consider whether adding, over time, a bunch of modules named shaXXX
> > doesn't mean we should start thinking about a way to group all these
> > algorithms into a single module.
>
> It would be possible to change the signature of sha.new() to
> sha.new('string', bits=256) and have all the variants in one module,
> if we want SHA-256 but not a separate module.
That seems like a very nice solution to me.
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040629/0b082418/attachment.bin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4